Show all previous court cases Plus ones I already filed, and ones people told me about they filed
Targeted Justice 2023 texas
Aby vs. Cambridge Health Alliance
Aby v. City of Cambridge
Akmal v. City of Kent
Athans v. Starbucks Coffee Co.
Ayres v. Obama
Bacardi Corporation of America v. Domenech
Banks – In Re Banks
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and U.S. Covert Government Agents
Banks v. Ben
Banks v. CIA 2013
Banks v. CIA 2014
Banks v. CIA 2016
Banks v. Corr. Corp. of Am.
Banks v. Dictorate, Science & Tech Ctr. (CIA), et al.
Banks v. Dictorate, Science & Technology Ctr.
Banks v. Hornak
Banks v. Jackson
Banks v. N.Y. Police Dept.
Banks v. New York Police Dept.
Banks v. NY Police
Banks v. NYPD
Banks v. Pivnichny
Banks v. Pope Francis
Banks v. Toe
Banks v. U.S. probation Dept. for the West. Dist Penn
Banks v. Unknown Named Number of U.S. Postal Inspectors, et al.
Barkhurst v. Clackamas City
Beverly v. Watson
Blue Mountain School District v. Snyder, et al.
Boyce v. Great W. Bank
Brodzki v. City of N. Richland Hills
Brodzki v. Clear Channel Communs.
Brodzki v. Ill. State Patrol
Brodzki v. Mont. State Patrol 2011.03.03
Brodzki v. Mont. State Patrol 2011.04.11
Brodzki v. Shannon
Brodzki v. Tarrant County DA
Brodzki v. Texas
Brodzki v. United States
Brodzki v. United States 2012.01.12 rev
Brodzki v. UPS
Brodzki v. Weiss
Brown – Younger v. Nevada
Brown – Younger v. U.S. Govt.
Brown v. Clark Cty Soc Servs
Brown v. Dillman
Brown v. FBI
Brown v. Nevada
Brown v. Parker
Brown v. Salvation Army
Brown v. United States DOJ
Brozzo v. U.S. Dept. of Education
Brozzo v. U.S. Dept. of Education 2016.09.09
Butters v. Herbert
Cain v. Atelier Esthetique Inst. of Esthetics, Inc.
Cain v. City of Ventura 2011.07.07
Cain v. City of Ventura 2011.09.21
Cain v. Obama
Cain v. St. Joseph Hospital
Campbell v. NSA
Carrasco v. U.S. Gov’t Justice Dep’t Strike Force
Caterbone v. National Security Agency
Caterbone v. NSA 2017.03.28
Caterbone v. U.S. President Donald Trump
Chambers v. Webster
Cheaton v. CIA
Christiana v. United States, et al.
Cooper v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections
Cortina v. United States
Cortina v. United States
Cossio v. Castro
Crawford v. AT&T
Edmond v. United States
Edye v. Robertson
Ehlers v. CIA
Ezike v. Na. R.R. Passenger Corp.
Fischer v. United States
Foggy v. United States Gov’t.
Foster v. Duval
Frederick Banks Fed. Reg. # 05711-068 v. C.I.A.
Frederick Banks v. Dir. Off of Sci. & Tech, Behavioral Modification Unit
Frederick Banks v. McCafferty
Frederick Banks v. NYPD
Frederick Banks v. Orlando
Frost v. Vasan
Gamache v. FBI
Gamache v. United States Fed. Govt.
Gamache v. Unknown
Gamache v. Various Unknown Individuals Employing Mind Altering Devices
Gardenshire v, Fishman 2018.02.15
Gibson v. NSA
Gloucester County School Board v. G.G. &mom
Gomez v. Fresno Police Dept.
Gomez v. Los Angeles DOJ
Grady v. United States DOD
Hairston v. Cheney
Hale v. FCC
Hale v. Towaliga District Attorneys Office, et al.
Halpern v. FBI
Hammock v. NASA et al.
Hauenstein v. Lynham
Hull v. Free Masons
Hundall v. U. Texas El Paso
Hundall v. U. Texas El Paso
Il Sun Jung v. Bloomberg
In re Richard P.
Jacobo-Melendres v. Sessions
Jenkins v. Temmessee
Jones v. North Atlantic Treaty Org
Jordon v. Tashiro
Jung v. Panetta
Kaminsky v. NSAA
Kevork In Re Kevork
Kinney v. Atlanta Police (In re)
Kolovrat v. Oregon
Krlich v. City of Hubbard et al.
Labella v. FBI 2008.05.08
Labella v. FBI 2009.10.05
Labella v. FBI 2012.02.09
Labella v. FBI 2012.02.09ver
Labella v. FBI 2012.03.19
Lampon-Paz v. Unknown Party
Larson v. Ethier
Lasar v. FBI
Latronica v. Halfhill
Lear v. Seattle Hous. Auth
Marchand v. Simonson
Marshall v. Green
Marshall v. Simpsom
Mayfield v. United States
McCorkle v. Ameritech
McGinnis v. Freudentha
McMahon v. Johnson
McMahon v. Johnson
Mendes v. United States
Meserve v. United States DOJ
Mettlen v. Kaste
Mimms v. Becerra
Mira v. Kingston, et al. 2017
Mira v. Media et al
Mitchel v. City of Elgin
Mitchel v. United States
Mitchell v. United States
Mohamed v. Holder 2011
Mohamed v. Holder 2014
Mohamed v. Holder 2015
Moore v. Delaware
Nace v. Pennridge Sch. Dist.
Nat’l Sec. Counselors v. CIA
Nazer v. FBI
Nazer v. United States
Oberuch v. Butler County Mental Health Bd.
Opheim v. Opheim
Pak v. Recio
Palacz v. Vill. of Harwood Heights
Price v. Equinox International/Vitasalus
Ransom v. Microsoft
Reid v. Mabus
Robinson v. Attorney General of U.S., et al.
Robinson v. Brannon
Roman v. CIA 2012.12.11
Roman v. CIA 2013.01.18
Roman v. NSA 2009.02.09
Roman v. NSA 2012.02.22
Schindler v. Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc.
Shelden v. Dept of Justice
Shelden v. United States
Shelton v. Crookshank 2017.11.17
Shelton v. Crookshank 2018.01.24
Shibuya v. George Washington Univ.
T. Rowe Price Servs. v. Frederick Banks
Taggart v. Office of Insp Gen.
Tansey v. City of Keller
Tansey v. Salomone
Taylor v. Obama
Taylor v. Obama Admin
Taylor v. Obama Admin ver
Terry v. NSA
Tew v. FBI
Tew v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.
Tew v. Yahoo, Inc.
Thompson v. DS Water
Toro v. City of New York
United States v. Banks
United States v. Blagojevich
United States v. Mailloux
United States v. Reynolds
United States v. Richards
United States v. Williamson
United States v. Williamson
Walbert v. Wichita Police Dep’t
Watkins v. United States Postal Service 2017.09.01
Watkins v. United States Postal Service 2017.10.12
Watterson vs. Aro
Weinstein v. CIA
White v. Department of Defense 2012 (FOIA)
White v. Department of Defense, et al. 2009 (FOIA)
White v. Regents of the University of California, et al. 1998
White v. Regents of the University of California, et al. 1998
Wilson v. NSA
Yang v. DEA
Submit
FacebookInstagramTwitterYouTubeFlickr
PRESS RELEASES
Bill to Support ‘Havana Syndrome’ Victims Unanimously Passes Senate
Jun 07 2021
WASHINGTON—Today, the Senate unanimously passed legislation to support American public servants who have incurred brain injuries from likely directed energy attacks. The Helping American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks (HAVANA) Act, which was authored by Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark R. Warner (D-VA) along with Senators Susan Collins (R-ME), Vice Chairman Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), would authorize additional financial support for injured individuals.
“Havana Syndrome” is the term given to an illness that first surfaced among more than 40 U.S. Embassy staff in Havana, Cuba, beginning in 2016. Since then, at least a dozen U.S. diplomats at the U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou suffered symptoms “consistent with the effects of directed, pulsed, radiofrequency energy,” and there have been according to the press more than 130 total cases among American personnel, including on U.S. soil. Symptoms have included severe headaches, dizziness, tinnitus, visual and hearing problems, vertigo, and cognitive difficulties, and many affected personnel continue to suffer from health problems years after the attacks. The HAVANA Act would give the CIA Director, the Secretary of State, and other agency heads additional authority to provide financial and medical support to those suffering from brain injuries as a result of these attacks.
“As the Intelligence Committee continues to push for more answers on these mysterious and debilitating attacks, I’m proud that the Senate overwhelmingly approved this bipartisan bill to ensure our U.S. personnel receive the compensation and care they rightfully deserve,” said Senate Intel Chairman Warner. “We continue to be indebted to these brave men and women who proudly serve our country while putting their own safety on the line, and this bill will make sure that we can provide financial relief as they seek medical treatment for the injuries they’ve endured.”
“Far too many ‘Havana Syndrome’ victims have had to battle the bureaucracy to receive care for their debilitating injuries. American personnel who have undergone these attacks while serving our country should be treated the same way we would treat a soldier who suffered a traumatic injury on the battlefield,” said Senator Collins. “I am pleased that there has been widespread, bipartisan support for my bill, which will provide additional support to these government employees who were harmed while representing our interests. We also need a whole-of-government approach to determine what this weapon is and who is wielding it in order to prevent future attacks and protect Americans.”
“I am pleased to see the Senate pass this important bipartisan legislation, which will provide the CIA Director and the U.S. Secretary of State with the authorities needed to properly assist U.S. personnel who have endured attacks while serving our nation,” Senate Intel Vice Chairman Rubio said. “There is no doubt that the victims who have suffered brain injuries must be provided with adequate care and compensation. Further, it is critical that our government determine who is behind these attacks and that we respond.”
“It is shameful and unacceptable that so many American public servants and their families who are suffering from these mysterious brain injuries have gone without access to the medical benefits they need and deserve. That must change, and today, the Senate took an important step forward to help right that wrong,” said Senator Shaheen. “Securing appropriate support for those injured has been a priority of mine for years, and I’m glad to partner with Senator Collins and this bipartisan group of lawmakers to build on that progress and help provide additional compensation for afflicted U.S. personnel. This bipartisan bill helps create a uniform response to these attacks, and I’ll keep working across the aisle to get to the bottom of these attacks and to support those suffering from critical injuries.”
The HAVANA Act would authorize the CIA Director and the Secretary of State to provide injured employees with additional financial support for brain injuries. Both the CIA and State Department would be required to create regulations detailing fair and equitable criteria for payment. This legislation would also require the CIA and State Department to report to Congress on how this authority is being used and if additional legislative or administrative action is required.
Senators Collins, Warner, Rubio, and Shaheen’s bill was co-sponsored by Senators John Cornyn (R-TX), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Roy Blunt (R-MO), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Richard Burr (R-NC), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Ben Sasse (R-NE), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Angus King (I-ME), James Risch (R-ID), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Rick Scott (R-FL), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Margaret Hassan (D-NH).
Click HERE to read the text of the bill.
###
